Search results
Results from the Health.Zone Content Network
United States v. Jones , 565 U.S. 400 (2012), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that installing a Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking device on a vehicle and using the device to monitor the vehicle's movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment .
United States v. Jones (1953), 345 U.S. 377 (1953) Jones (2012) , 565 U.S. 400 (2012), ruling that installing a GPS tracking device on a vehicle and using the device to monitor the vehicle's movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment
This review is transcluded from Talk:United States v. Jones (2012)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Reviewer: Quadell (talk · contribs) 14:16, 11 November 2013 (UTC) Reply Nominator: Sailing to Byzantium. This is a very strong candidate. I found a few issues, listed below.
One notable incident of warrantless GPS tracking in 2005 led to United States v. Jones, decided by the United States Supreme Court. In Jones the police obtained a warrant to attach a GPS device to the underside of the defendant's car but then violated the warrant's scope in both geography and in length of time.
Carpenter v. United States, 585 U.S. 296, 138 S.Ct. 2206 (2018), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the privacy of historical cell site location information (CSLI). The Court held that the government violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution when it accesses historical CSLI records containing the ...
Nearly three decades later, the Court decided United States v. Jones (2012), a case concerning the federal government's installation of a Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking device on a suspect's vehicle and its use to continuously monitor that vehicle's location for 28 days. The Court voted 9–0 against the government.
Oliver is certainly a notable case but I don't understand its connection to Jones, so I think it should go. --Dr. Fleischman 23:31, 23 November 2013 (UTC) Reply . When the "Notes" refer to pages of "United States v. Jones (Oral Argument Transcript)", the link takes them to the main reference under "References".
United States v. Jones (disambiguation) has only one valid entry on it, United States v. Jones (2012); one entry on the page is solely a redlink, contrary to WP:MOSDAB; the rest have no link at all, obviously also contrary to MOSDAB. Although several cases exist with the caption, United States v. Jones, only one case has a Wikipedia article ...