Health.Zone Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the Health.Zone Content Network
  2. Revised Penal Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revised_Penal_Code

    One distinct aspect of the Revised Penal Code centers on its classification of aggravating, exempting and mitigating circumstances, the appreciation of which affects the gradation of penalties. Penalties under the Revised Penal Code are generally divided into three periods – the minimum period, the medium period, and the maximum period.

  3. Remote procedure call - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_procedure_call

    Remote procedure call. In distributed computing, a remote procedure call (RPC) is when a computer program causes a procedure (subroutine) to execute in a different address space (commonly on another computer on a shared computer network), which is written as if it were a normal (local) procedure call, without the programmer explicitly writing ...

  4. Mitigating factor - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitigating_factor

    Mitigating factor. In criminal law, a mitigating factor, also known as an extenuating circumstance, is any information or evidence presented to the court regarding the defendant or the circumstances of the crime that might result in reduced charges or a lesser sentence. Unlike a legal defense, the presentation of mitigating factors will not ...

  5. Mitigating evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitigating_evidence

    Mitigating evidence is evidence that is provided (usually by the defendant in a criminal trial) in order to try to establish the presence of mitigating circumstances. The presence of mitigating circumstances can reduce the punishment imposed for the offense. The case of the Oregon v. Guzek dealt with the issue of whether alibi evidence not ...

  6. Strickland v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strickland_v._Washington

    Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), was a landmark Supreme Court case that established the standard for determining when a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel is violated by that counsel's inadequate performance. The decision was a compromise by the majority in which the varying "tests for ineffective performance of ...

  7. Douglas v. Veterans Administration - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_v._Veterans...

    mitigating circumstances surrounding the offense such as unusual job tensions, personality problems, mental impairment, harassment, or bad faith, malice or provocation on the part of others involved in the matter; and; the adequacy and effectiveness of alternative sanctions to deter such conduct in the future by the employee or others.

  8. Mount Rennie rape case - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Rennie_rape_case

    Mount Rennie rape case. The Mount Rennie rape case is the only gang rape in Sydney, Australia during the 1880s that led to a full conviction of the participants involved in the crime—young larrikins of the " Waterloo Push ". [1] The attack is sometimes referred to as the "Mount Rennie Outrage" or the "Waterloo Outrage".

  9. Kansas v. Carr - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas_v._Carr

    VIII. Kansas v. Carr, 577 U.S. 108 (2016), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States clarified several procedures for sentencing defendants in capital cases. Specifically, the Court held that judges are not required to affirmatively instruct juries about the burden of proof for establishing mitigating evidence, and that joint ...