Health.Zone Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the Health.Zone Content Network
  2. Pro se legal representation (/ ˌ p r oʊ ˈ s iː / or / ˌ p r oʊ ˈ s eɪ /) comes from Latin pro se, meaning "for oneself" or "on behalf of themselves" which, in modern law, means to argue on one's own behalf in a legal proceeding, as a defendant or plaintiff in civil cases, or a defendant in criminal cases, rather than have representation from counsel or an attorney.

  3. Barrister - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrister

    A barrister is a lawyer who represents a litigant as an advocate before a court. A barrister speaks in court and presents the case before a judge, with or without a jury. In some jurisdictions, a barrister receives additional training in evidence law, ethics, and court practice and procedure.

  4. Professional responsibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_responsibility

    Judicial misconduct. v. t. e. Professional responsibility is a set of duties within the concept of professional ethics for those who exercise a unique set of knowledge and skill as professionals. [1] Professional responsibility applies to those professionals making judgments, applying their unique skills, and reaching informed decisions for, or ...

  5. UA prof: Defendants representing themselves have 'fool for a ...

    www.aol.com/news/ua-prof-defendants-representing...

    Local legal experts say pro se defendants have most often have a 'fool for a client.' They say pro se creates challenges and leads to poor results.

  6. Conflict of interest - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_interest

    In the United States, a law firm usually cannot represent a client if the client's interests conflict with those of another client, even if the two clients are represented by separate lawyers within the firm, unless (in some jurisdictions) the lawyer is segregated from the rest of the firm for the duration of the conflict. Law firms often ...

  7. R v Neil - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Neil

    R v Neil, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 631, 2002 SCC 70, is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on conflict of interests among lawyers. The Court held that both firms and lawyers have a fiduciary duty of loyalty to their clients and so a lawyer or firm cannot represent a client whose interests may be adverse to the interests of another client unless there is consent and a reasonable belief ...

  8. Solicitor advocate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solicitor_Advocate

    Solicitor advocate is a hybrid status which allows a solicitor in the United Kingdom and Hong Kong to represent clients in higher courts in proceedings that were traditionally reserved for barristers. The status does not exist in most other common law jurisdictions where, for the most part, all solicitors have rights of audience in higher courts.

  9. Attorney–client privilege - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attorney–client_privilege

    t. e. Attorney–client privilege or lawyer–client privilege is the common law doctrine of legal professional privilege in the United States. Attorney–client privilege is " [a] client's right to refuse to disclose and to prevent any other person from disclosing confidential communications between the client and the attorney."