Search results
Results from the Health.Zone Content Network
A lawsuit challenging a provision of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) could eliminate or restrict three-quarters of preventive benefits covered by the law, according to a recent report. Out of 192 ...
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519 (2012), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court upheld Congress's power to enact most provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), commonly called Obamacare, and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (HCERA), including a requirement for most Americans to pay a ...
Since the passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), there have been numerous actions in federal courts to challenge the constitutionality of the legislation. They include challenges by states against the ACA, reactions from legal experts with respect to its constitutionality, several federal court rulings on the ACA's constitutionality, the final ruling on the constitutionality of the ...
Laws applied. Case or Controversy Clause, U.S. Const. Art. III. California v. Texas, 593 U.S. 659 (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the constitutionality of the 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA), colloquially known as Obamacare. It was the third such challenge to the ACA seen by the Supreme Court since its enactment.
March 4, 2024 at 7:27 AM. NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A federal appeals court was scheduled to hear arguments Monday on whether former President Barack Obama's signature health care law requires full ...
On a healthcare bill, no less. The discussions began after the Republicans’ “skinny” repeal plan for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) suffered a narrow defeat a week and a half ago.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, better known as Obamacare, has been controversial from the moment it was enacted. Many opponents have fought against it and now some have taken ...
United States House of Representatives v. Azar, et al. (previously v.Price, et al.; originally v. Burwell, et al.) was a lawsuit in which the United States House of Representatives sued departments and officials within the executive branch, asserting that President Barack Obama acted illegally in his implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.