Health.Zone Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the Health.Zone Content Network
  2. Federal Employers Liability Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Federal_Employers_Liability_Act

    The Federal Employers Liability Act was designed to put on the railroad industry some of the costs of the legs, arms, eyes, and lives which it consumed in its operation. Not all these costs were imposed, for the Act did not make the employer an insurer. The liability which it imposed was the liability for negligence.

  3. Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Employees...

    U.S.C. sections amended. 28 U.S.C. § 2679. The Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act of 1988, also known as the Westfall Act, is a law passed by the United States Congress that modifies the Federal Tort Claims Act to protect federal employees from common law tort lawsuit while engaged in their duties for the government ...

  4. Workers' compensation (United States) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workers'_compensation_...

    Workers' compensation (which formerly was known as workmen's compensation until the name was changed to make it gender neutral) in the United States is a primarily state-based [1] system of workers' compensation . In the United States, some form of workers compensation is typically compulsory for almost all employers in most states (depending ...

  5. Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worker_Adjustment_and...

    The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988 (the "WARN Act") is a U.S. labor law that protects employees, their families, and communities by requiring most employers with 100 or more employees to provide notification 60 calendar days in advance of planned closings and mass layoffs of employees. [1]

  6. Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R. Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dice_v._Akron,_Canton...

    Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R. Co., 342 U.S. 359 (1952), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that federal court rules apply when an action is brought pursuant to a federal right and where the substance of a state's rules would necessarily have an adverse effect on the protection of an individual's rights under federal law.

  7. Negligent infliction of emotional distress - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negligent_infliction_of...

    The tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress ( NIED) is a controversial cause of action, which is available in nearly all U.S. states but is severely constrained and limited in the majority of them. The underlying concept is that one has a legal duty to use reasonable care to avoid causing emotional distress to another individual.

  8. Thompson Coburn - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thompson_Coburn

    Norfolk Southern Ry. Co. v. Sorrell, No. 05–746 (Co-counsel for Petitioner and Counsel below) (standards of causation and negligence under the Federal EmployersLiability Act) (decided Jan. 10, 2007, 549 U.S. 158) Federal Maritime Commission v.

  9. Title 42 of the United States Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_42_of_the_United...

    Title 42 of the United States Code is the United States Code dealing with public health, social welfare, and civil rights. Parts of Title 42 which formerly related to the US space program have been transferred to Title 51. Chapters. 42 U.S.C. ch. 1—The Public Health Service; 42 U.S.C. ch. 1A—The Public Health Service, Supplemental Provisions