Health.Zone Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the Health.Zone Content Network
  2. United States v. Grubbs - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Grubbs

    United States v. Grubbs, 547 U.S. 90 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the constitutionality of "anticipatory" search warrants under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court ruled that such warrants, which are issued in advance of a "triggering condition" that makes them ...

  3. Arizona v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_v._United_States

    Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case involving Arizona's SB 1070, a state law intended to increase the powers of local law enforcement that wished to enforce federal immigration laws. The issue is whether the law usurps the federal government's authority to regulate immigration laws and enforcement.

  4. Roth v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roth_v._United_States

    Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957), along with its companion case Alberts v.California, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which redefined the constitutional test for determining what constitutes obscene material unprotected by the First Amendment. [1]

  5. United States v. Comstock - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Comstock

    United States v. Comstock , 560 U.S. 126 (2010), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States , which held that the federal government has authority under the Necessary and Proper Clause to require the civil commitment of individuals already in Federal custody. [ 1 ]

  6. Nixon v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_v._United_States

    Nixon v. United States, 506 U.S. 224 (1993), was a United States Supreme Court decision that determined that a question of whether the Senate had properly tried an impeachment was political in nature and could not be resolved in the courts if there was no applicable judicial standard.

  7. New York v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_v._United_States

    New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court.Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, writing for the majority, found that the federal government may not require states to “take title” to radioactive waste through the "Take Title" provision of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act, which the Court found to exceed Congress's power ...

  8. United States v. Alvarez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Alvarez

    United States v. Alvarez , 567 U.S. 709 (2012), is a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Stolen Valor Act of 2005 was unconstitutional. The Stolen Valor Act of 2005 was a federal law that criminalized false statements about having a military medal.

  9. United States v. Jones (2012) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Jones_(2012)

    United States v. Jones , 565 U.S. 400 (2012), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that installing a Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking device on a vehicle and using the device to monitor the vehicle's movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment .