Health.Zone Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the Health.Zone Content Network
  2. Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucasfilm_Ltd_v_Ainsworth

    Lord Mance. Lord Collins. Lucasfilm Limited v Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 39 was a 2011 court ruling by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. [1] [2] The case concerned an intellectual property dispute over the production of Lucasfilm's Stormtrooper costumes by model maker Andrew Ainsworth. [3] Mr Ainsworth argued that the helmets, which he ...

  3. Gregory v. City of Chicago - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregory_v._City_of_Chicago

    Black, joined by Douglas. Concurrence. Harlan. Laws applied. U.S. Const. amends. I, XIV. Gregory v. Chicago, 394 U.S. 111 (1969), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court overturned the disorderly conduct charges against Dick Gregory and others for peaceful demonstrations in Chicago.

  4. Cannon v. University of Chicago - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Cannon_v._University_of_Chicago

    20 U.S.C. §§ 1681–1683. Cannon v. University of Chicago, 441 U.S. 677 (1979), was a United States Supreme Court case which interpreted Congressional silence in the face of earlier interpretations of similar laws to determine that Title IX of the Higher Education Act provides an implied cause of action. [1]

  5. Chicago Board of Trade v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Board_of_Trade_v...

    Sherman Antitrust Act. Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, 246 U.S. 231 (1918), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States applied the "rule of reason" to the internal trading rules of a commodity market. Section 1 of the Sherman Act flatly states: "Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or ...

  6. Dosso case - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dosso_case

    Dosso v. Federation of Pakistan was the first constitutional case after the promulgation of Constitution of Pakistan of 1956 and an important case in Pakistan's political history. The case gained prominence as it indirectly questioned the first martial law imposed by President Iskander Mirza in 1958.

  7. Othman (Abu Qatada) v United Kingdom - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Othman_(Abu_Qatada)_v...

    Othman (Abu Qatada) v United Kingdom. Othman (Abu Qatada) v. United Kingdom was a 2012 judgment of the European Court of Human Rights which stated that under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights the United Kingdom could not lawfully deport Abu Qatada to Jordan, because of the risk of the use of evidence obtained by torture. [1]

  8. Reynolds v. Sims - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_v._Sims

    XIV ( Equal Protection Clause) Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (1946) (in part) Reynolds v. Sims. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the electoral districts of state legislative chambers must be roughly equal in population. Along with Baker v.

  9. Talk:McDonald v. City of Chicago - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:McDonald_v._City_of...

    City of Chicago → McDonald v. Chicago – McDonald v. Chicago appears to be the WP:COMMONNAME. The Oyez Project [1], Cornell Law School [2], Bill of Rights Institute [3], and when I looked it up the hyperlink for the Supreme Court page just said McDonald v. Chicago, obviously it gives the full title upon entering.