Health.Zone Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: pro se criminal

Search results

  1. Results from the Health.Zone Content Network
  2. Pro se legal representation (/ ˌ p r oʊ ˈ s iː / or / ˌ p r oʊ ˈ s eɪ /) comes from Latin pro se, meaning "for oneself" or "on behalf of themselves" which, in modern law, means to argue on one's own behalf in a legal proceeding, as a defendant or plaintiff in civil cases, or a defendant in criminal cases, rather than have representation from counsel or an attorney.

  3. Assistance of Counsel Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assistance_of_Counsel_Clause

    A criminal defendant may represent himself, unless a court deems the defendant to be incompetent to waive the right to counsel. In Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975), the Supreme Court recognized a defendant's right to pro se representation. However, under Godinez v.

  4. Godinez v. Moran - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godinez_v._Moran

    Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. 389 (1993), was a landmark decision in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that if a defendant was competent to stand trial, they were automatically competent to plead guilty, and thereby waive the panoply of trial rights, including the right to counsel.

  5. Introducing The Posner Center of Justice for Pro Se’s - AOL

    www.aol.com/introducing-posner-center-justice...

    The Posner Center of Justice for Pro Se’s has a bold vision: to provide pro bono representation, but also to focus on assisting pro se litigants behind the scenes to help them to successfully ...

  6. Faretta v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faretta_v._California

    A criminal defendant in a state proceeding has a constitutional right to knowingly refuse the aid of an attorney. Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that criminal defendants have a constitutional right to refuse counsel and represent themselves in state criminal proceedings.

  7. Indiana v. Edwards - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_v._Edwards

    Indiana v. Edwards, 554 U.S. 164 (2008), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the standard for competency to stand trial was not linked to the standard for competency to represent oneself.

  8. Standby counsel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standby_counsel

    The appointment of standby counsel over a pro se defendant's objection was ruled not to be a violation of the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to self-representation as long as the defendant has a fair opportunity to present his case in his own way and standby counsel's unsolicited involvement is kept within reasonable limits in McKaskle v.

  9. Expungement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expungement

    The petitioner may choose to hire an attorney to guide them through the process, or he/she can decide to represent themselves. This is called appearing pro se. Limits of expungement. A criminal record can only be expunged by the jurisdiction in which it was created. The federal government cannot order the expungement of state criminal records.

  1. Ad

    related to: pro se criminal