Health.Zone Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: pro se litigant

Search results

  1. Results from the Health.Zone Content Network
  2. Pro se legal representation (/ ˌ p r oʊ ˈ s iː / or / ˌ p r oʊ ˈ s eɪ /) comes from Latin pro se, meaning "for oneself" or "on behalf of themselves" which, in modern law, means to argue on one's own behalf in a legal proceeding, as a defendant or plaintiff in civil cases, or a defendant in criminal cases, rather than have representation from counsel or an attorney.

  3. List of U.S. state constitutional provisions allowing self ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._State...

    In dealing with the pro se litigant, a judge must remain impartial but ensure that the litigant receives a fair hearing. If the judge does too much to help the party, she risks becoming an advocate; if she does too little, the party is denied the fundamental right to a fair hearing.

  4. Legal ghostwriting - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_ghostwriting

    The growth of pro se litigants can be attributed to the high cost of litigation, anti-lawyer sentiment, and the advent of do-it-yourself law services. However, self-represented litigants may still need legal representation in order and to navigate the litigation process.

  5. Vexatious litigation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vexatious_litigation

    Under California Code of Civil Procedure § 391.7(a), any vexatious litigant who disobeys the prefiling order may be punished for contempt of court. Under California law a vexatious litigant is someone who does any of the following, most of which require that the litigant be proceeding pro se, i.e., representing himself:

  6. Work-product doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work-product_doctrine

    In American civil procedure, the work-product doctrine protects materials prepared in anticipation of litigation from discovery by opposing counsel. [1] It is also known as the work-product rule, the work-product immunity, the work-product exception, and the work-product privilege, though there is debate about whether it is truly a "privilege." [2]

  7. Hagens Berman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hagens_Berman

    Website. www .hbsslaw .com. Hagens Berman is a law firm headquartered in Seattle, Washington. As of 2022, it had about 80 lawyers. [1] Hagens Berman is a plaintiff's law firm, [2] especially known for large class-action lawsuits. [3] The firm was founded in 1993 by Steve Berman and Carl Hagens in order to pursue a case against Jack in the Box ...

  8. Talk:Pro se legal representation in the United States/Archive 1

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Pro_se_legal...

    Francis Davey 12:50, 23 June 2007 (UTC) PRO SE and PRO PER are NOT the same. The desire to merge these articles illustrates incredible ignorance. Pro Per is short for PROPRIA PERSONA, Pro Se is not. A Pro Se litigant is representing himself, and a Pro Per litigant is there AS himself with out any representation.

  9. Right to counsel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_counsel

    In criminal law, the right to counsel means a defendant has a legal right to have the assistance of counsel (i.e., lawyers) and, if the defendant cannot afford a lawyer, requires that the government appoint one or pay the defendant's legal expenses. The right to counsel is generally regarded as a constituent of the right to a fair trial.

  1. Ads

    related to: pro se litigant