Health.Zone Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the Health.Zone Content Network
  2. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayo_Collaborative...

    Mayo v. Prometheus, 566 U.S. 66 (2012), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that unanimously held that claims directed to a method of giving a drug to a patient, measuring metabolites of that drug, and with a known threshold for efficacy in mind, deciding whether to increase or decrease the dosage of the drug, were not patent-eligible subject matter.

  3. McDonald v. City of Chicago - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald_v._City_of_Chicago

    Texas (1894) McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010), was a landmark [1] decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that found that the right of an individual to "keep and bear arms", as protected under the Second Amendment, is incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment and is thereby enforceable against the states.

  4. Terminiello v. City of Chicago - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminiello_v._City_of_Chicago

    Terminiello v. City of Chicago, 337 U.S. 1 (1949), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a "breach of peace" ordinance of the City of Chicago that banned speech that "stirs the public to anger, invites dispute, brings about a condition of unrest, or creates a disturbance" was unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States ...

  5. Jarndyce and Jarndyce - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jarndyce_and_Jarndyce

    Jarndyce and Jarndyce (or Jarndyce v Jarndyce) is a fictional probate case in Bleak House (1852–53) by Charles Dickens, progressing in the English Court of Chancery. The case is a central plot device in the novel and has become a byword for seemingly interminable legal proceedings. Dickens refers to the case as "Jarndyce and Jarndyce", the ...

  6. Charges dropped in federal juice loan extortion case ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/charges-dropped-federal-juice-loan...

    Terrence Antonio James/Chicago Tribune/TNS. After a chaotic mistrial earlier this month, a federal juice loan extortion case with ties to a larger probe of the Chicago Outfit ended Monday when ...

  7. City of Chicago v. Morales - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Chicago_v._Morales

    Thomas, joined by Rehnquist, Scalia. Laws applied. U.S. Const. amend. XIV. City of Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (1999), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a law cannot be so vague that a person of ordinary intelligence can not figure out what is innocent activity and what is illegal.

  8. Companies hoping to evade CFPB don't get what they want ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/companies-hoping-evade-cfpb...

    In the case — CFPB v. Community Financial Services Association of America — the high court held in a 7-2 decision that the agency’s funding meets the requirements of the Constitution’s ...

  9. US tells UN: Israel undermines goals with civilian harm in Gaza

    www.aol.com/news/us-tells-un-israel-undermines...

    The draft text also cites a ruling by the International Court of Justice on May 24 that ordered Israel to immediately halt its military assault on Rafah, in a landmark emergency ruling in South ...