Health.Zone Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the Health.Zone Content Network
  2. United States v. Washington (2022) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v...

    United States v. Washington, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with workers' compensation laws at the federal and state level. The case revolved around compensation for non-federal employees working for nuclear and chemical cleanup on the Hanford Site in Washington State required under state law.

  3. AES Corporation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AES_Corporation

    The AES Corporation is an American utility and power generation company. It owns and operates power plants, which it uses to generate and sell electricity to end users and intermediaries like utilities and industrial facilities. AES is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia, and is one of the world's leading power companies, generating and ...

  4. Jarmila Wolfe - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jarmila_Wolfe

    Wimbledon. 3R ( 2015) US Open. QF ( 2011) Team competitions. Fed Cup. 6–10. Jarmila Wolfe [1] [2] (née Gajdošová, formerly Groth; born 26 April 1987) is a Slovak-Australian former tennis player. In her career, she won two singles titles and one doubles title on the WTA Tour, as well as 14 singles and ten doubles titles on the ITF Women's ...

  5. United States v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Washington

    United States v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash. 1974), aff'd, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975), commonly known as the Boldt Decision (from the name of the trial court judge, George Hugo Boldt), was a legal case in 1974 heard in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

  6. Strickland v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strickland_v._Washington

    Dissent. Marshall. Laws applied. U.S. Const. amend. VI. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), was a landmark Supreme Court case that established the standard for determining when a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel is violated by that counsel's inadequate performance. [1] The Court, in a decision by Justice O'Connor ...

  7. Russian court rejects new appeal by US reporter Evan ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/russian-court-rejects-detained...

    April 23, 2024 at 10:54 AM. MOSCOW (Reuters) - A Russian court on Tuesday rejected the latest in a series of appeals by Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich against his pre-trial ...

  8. Russia breached global chemical weapons ban in Ukraine war ...

    www.aol.com/news/russia-breached-global-chemical...

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The United States on Wednesday accused Russia of violating the international chemical weapons ban by deploying the choking agent chloropicrin against Ukrainian troops and ...

  9. Crawford v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crawford_v._Washington

    Ohio v. Roberts (1980) Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that reformulated the standard for determining when the admission of hearsay statements in criminal cases is permitted under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. The Court held that prior testimonial statements of ...