Search results
Results from the Health.Zone Content Network
III, amends. V, VI. Smith v. United States, 599 U.S. ___ (2023), is a United States Supreme Court case pertaining to Article III and the Sixth Amendment. The Court held that a defendant may be retried following a jury trial conducted in the improper venue before a jury drawn from the incorrect district. [1] [2]
U.S. Const. amend. Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), is a United States Supreme Court case that held that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual.
Wimbledon. 3R ( 2015) US Open. QF ( 2011) Team competitions. Fed Cup. 6–10. Jarmila Wolfe [1] [2] (née Gajdošová, formerly Groth; born 26 April 1987) is a Slovak-Australian former tennis player. In her career, she won two singles titles and one doubles title on the WTA Tour, as well as 14 singles and ten doubles titles on the ITF Women's ...
Cert. granted sub nom., Smith v. United States, 567 U.S. 916 (2012). 9-0 in favor of United States. The burden of proof remains on the defendant to prove withdrawal from a conspiracy. Smith v. United States, 568 U.S. 106 (2013), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States of America. [1] The case was argued on November 6, 2012 ...
2 × depth charge roll-off stern racks, 4 × K-gun depth charge projectors. USS Smith (DD-378) was a Mahan -class destroyer in the United States Navy before and during World War II. She was named for Lieutenant Joseph B. Smith, USN. Smith was a senior officer aboard USS Congress and killed when CSS Virginia sank her. [1]
Smith v. United States, 508 U.S. 223 (1993), is a United States Supreme Court case that held that the exchange of a gun for drugs constituted "use" of the firearm for purposes of a federal statute imposing penalties for "use" of a firearm "during and in relation to" a drug trafficking crime . In Watson v.
Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court spelled out standards for "effectiveness" in the constitutional right to legal counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. [1] Previously the court had determined that the Sixth Amendment included the right to "effective assistance" of legal counsel, but it ...
Smith. Alvarez v. Smith. Alvarez, Cook County State's Attorney v. Smith, et al. Smith v. City of Chicago, 524 F.3d 834 ( 7th Cir. 2008); cert. granted, 555 U.S. 1169 (2009). Alvarez v. Smith, 558 U.S. 87 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court decision on seizure of property by the Chicago Police Department, however the case was declared moot ...